Ajarn Forum - Living and Teaching In Thailand - View Single Post - Is quoting the wikipedia acceptable in intelligent debate?
View Single Post
Old 12th February 2008, 14:28   #11 (permalink)
Benedict XVI
Benedict XVI is.....
I Vill Break You
 
Benedict XVI's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Just call me "Ratzi."
Posts: 1,843
vCash: 500
Rep Power: 200
Benedict XVI has a reputation beyond reputeBenedict XVI has a reputation beyond reputeBenedict XVI has a reputation beyond reputeBenedict XVI has a reputation beyond reputeBenedict XVI has a reputation beyond reputeBenedict XVI has a reputation beyond reputeBenedict XVI has a reputation beyond reputeBenedict XVI has a reputation beyond reputeBenedict XVI has a reputation beyond reputeBenedict XVI has a reputation beyond reputeBenedict XVI has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is quoting the wikipedia acceptable in intelligent debate?

Quote:
Originally Posted by garro
I'm not sure where I stand exactly on this issue. Is the wikipedia an acceptable resource to back up intelligent debate?
Wiki is good for non-political info (because of the bias) and controversial topics.

The bibliography and additional sources are helpfu. I wouldn't trust it too much. I've bias and innacuracy in Wiki on occasion.

That said, it's a great resource for looking something up quickly and getting general info about someone, or something.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"I distrust those people who know so
well what God wants them to do because
I notice it always coincides with
their own desires." --Susan B. Anthony
Benedict XVI is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.07850 seconds with 13 queries