Quote:
|
Originally Posted by keeshou
The point is that they reported the information in a manner that wasn't pro Israeli and you are still accusing Wikipedia of being pro Jewish
|
1. "Several official US and Israeli investigations maintained the initially published conclusion that the event was a tragic mistake through misidentification."
2. "Both the Israeli and American governments conducted multiple inquiries into the incident, and issued reports concluding that the attack was a tragic mistake, caused by confusion about the identity of the USS Liberty"
Both those statements are
blatant lies. Face up to it.
Quote:
|
You are going to accuse them of something despite the facts that don't bear out your accusation.
|
The facts are that the above statements are lies.
Quote:
|
What is your obsession with Jewish people anyway
|
I have no "obsession with Jewish people". I am opposed to Zionism, because it constitutes a serious threat to everybody in the world, whether through wars or the destruction of civil rights. The single main threat to free speech in the West concerns efforts by Zionists to stop discussion of the many wrongs committed by Israel.