Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Larkinny
You're trolling again.
|
I don't troll Larkinny, I just am pointing out your idiosyncrasies. It's obvious to me that you've been accused of trolling on other sites before and now you're accusing me of doing it to defend against the accusation falling on your head.
Now take a breath and think about what you've said:
Originally Posted by
Larkinny
Quote:
|
"I just gave you about NIST, where they said the temperatures didn't get that high."
|
Yet in all of your previous posts regarding the NIST you point out their incompentacy and now you are using them as a reliable source
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Larkinny
|
and this one
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Larkinny
It is firstly noted that NIST have refused continual invitations to debate these issues, but instead choose to answer their own interpretations of the many unanswered questions. But even in doing so it is apparent that their story is falling apart like an old suitcase.
|
and this is the one that is the most ironic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Larkinny
That's the official story, but NIST had to alter the test procedures in order to achieve the desired result. IOW, fixing the facts around the policy. Hardly scientific, eh?
|
Yet after you've accused them of these things you expect us to accept that in this case (where you want
these FACTS to fit your theory) the NIST is correct?
How can you possibly be thick enough to say that I'm trolling or do you just think we are that thick?