Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Larkinny
it does not automatically follow that ALL the technical data presented in the report is false.
|
So when you wrote this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larkinny
That's the official story, but NIST had to alter the test procedures in order to achieve the desired result. IOW, fixing the facts around the policy. Hardly scientific, eh?
|
you weren't saying that the NIST had altered test procedures?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Larkinny
Only a fool would assert otherwise. And that's what you're doing. The fact that you can't see that shows you're the thick one.
|
Next time read the posts that I've quoted from you. You stated (not me) that the NIST "
had to alter the test procedures in order to achieve the desired result." and then you try to accuse me of not knowing the difference between "Black and White".
Science is Black and White, you don't return results from an experiment with a grey result or an altered result and expect anyone to take you seriously. I've not accused the NIST of this, you have and you are too thick to realize that after you did this you made their scientific credibility suspect.
So, you either feel they are reliable or you don't feel they are a reliable source for information and FACTS. Unless you are contending that FACTS don't need to be BLACK or WHITE, which is what I suspect in your case.