
Originally Posted by
wangsuda
During my studies in rhetorical communications and cross cultural education, I learned that ANY:
1. culture, sub-culture, splinter culture
2. Language, dialect, variational/regional spin-off
3. Religion, splinter religion, cult
4. Ethnicity, sub-ethnicity, ethnic mixture
Can be analyzed and classified, both qualitatively and quantitatively. There are too many studies that bear this out; too many peer-reviewed journals that prove this point again and again. To say that "Jain, who has been a visiting professor at Sasin, said the four concepts of fun, fulfilment, friendliness and flexibility could provide an underlying framework for policy-makers to further build a marketing strategy for Thailand. The four concepts, he added, were unique to Thailand, and could not be found in other countries" shows nothing but ignorance. To further say that "to understand Thai, you need to be Thai," shows nothing but ignorance AND stupidity.
My question (stated simply) is this: how can you lose something if you don't even know what it is? In order to lose Thainess, Thainess must be clearly defined; that way, you know EXACTLY what you are losing. So here's you chance, Thai nationals, tell me what (exactly) Thainess is. Tell me in clear terms. And tell me how you are losing it to less than 2% of your population. And if you're really good, tell me how "whitey" is taking it away from you while the Chinese are not. I guess what I am saying is "put up or shut up."
Bookmarks