^My head is filled with useless info. When you hear the terms "bear" and "twink, you don't forget them. Also, as someone who revels in adolescent humor, it's important to know as much about gay culture as possible.
You weren't being terribly nice, Warhammer, were you now? Fair do's.Originally Posted by Warhammer820
I thought that you - of all people - you'd respect how other people choose to live their lives, even if you don't necessarily like it. (Not people like Bill O'Reilly obviously. I mean normal different people.)
It wouldn't kill you to refer to a ladyboy in a way that won't piss her off. (See what I did? Yesss...)
I was just rather disappointed in you at the time.
Anyway, I was obviously looking for a springboard. That was Monday wasn't it? Yeah, Monday. I think someone spiked my cocoa on Monday.
Last edited by Anna Key; 24th October 2012 at 20:05.
"Take this, brother; may it serve you well."
Spiked cocoa not good!
Oh, it wasn't all bad. In a way, I'd wish they'd spike it more often.
That was a bit Joe Orton.
Open a coconut and leave it in the Sun for a few weeks. It will spike itself.
^^^^LOL at you editing Jimmy Saville to Bill O'Reilly, Anna. Warhammer will certainly be more familiar with O'Reilly...though I think Jerry Sandusky might've been a more appropriate substitution.
I'm intrigued...
---Update---
There was a bit of cultural consideration to it, Beavis, but the real reason for the edit was that having typed 'Jimmy Savile' and then sat back, smirking and taking a drag on my cigarette, I realised that I didn't really want to allude to paedophilia in any way. Somebody 'speed-reading' the thread might go off on one and muddy the waters horribly. Too big a risk.
Bill O'Reilly was the most sexless hate figure I could imagine.
I leant back, smirked again, and took another drag of my cigarette.
Then I realised that actually, no - Bill O'Reilly is the personification of a punter ('John'). All that 'power' and fame and shit... he's definitely round at Mistress Domina's place every fortnight. I was going to change it again.
And then I thought, ' Nah, STET. Bill O'Reilly will do just fine. He's been a very naughty, bold, fresh boy. STET that fucker."
I will rephrase...they want a feminine human being...with a cock...I will go further...if they just wanted anal sex with a feminine human being...they could do that with a woman...does my logic continue to confuse?
---Update---
Most paedophiles are heterosexual...fact
They want anal sex with a willing human being that is going to enjoy it. The chances of finding a girl that will agree to anal are low and the chances she will enjoy it even lower. Most of em barely even enjoy regular sex for chrissakes.
It's a moot point. I thought I'd already explained.
I remember this subject being raised some years back...if I recall a female poster from Nottingham said she enjoyed it...I guess it depends on lots of things...
---Update---
Paedophilia has nothing to do with homosexuality...most people are hetero...most paedos are hetero...simple mathematics
...the male anus is more suitable for penetration: it self-lubricates out of fear...
...majestically enthroned amid the vulgar herd...
really?
Why are you going on about it?
So now anyone who doesn't want to fuck a bloke is 'homophobic'.But while the homophobic German was in the toilet,
It's getting ridiculous.
Having a quote from someone on the Forum as your signature. Legal?
Posting Permissions
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Bookmarks