Look at them yo-yos
That's the way ya TEFL
You play the hang-man in a sweet EP
No, that ain't workin'
That's the way ya TEFL
Get your Thai baht for nothin' and your giks for free...
No wonder why things seem so quiet.
There's a Youtube moment attached to this article where she talks about "perfecting Jews". Classic Coulter!
Ann Coulter Broken Jaw - Good news for Obama | Ready2Beat
The President of America, Barack Obama may have gotten an early holiday gift. Ann Coulter has a broken jaw.
Ann Coulter, the outspoken right-wing political columnist seen all across American television leading up to the 2008 Presidential Election, Ann Coulter's jaw has been wired shut apparently she broke it and thus she has been forced to keep quiet after she took a fall last month.
The doctors have supposedly wired her jaw and she has to remain clamped shut. There was no word on how she was taking in her food.
I once heard a Democratic strategist proclaim on television that God is the only person who can silence Ann Coulter. Maybe he was right. This fall, Coulter won't be doing much talking since her mouth will be wired shut!
Coulters' broken jaw is an early Christmas gift for many, especially minorities. We haven't heard much from Ann lately, and it looks like that is one constant that will remain!
Blah, Blah, blah, bla.
DONE DEAL!!
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth. The court did not comment on its order Monday rejecting the call by Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick, N.J., to intervene in the presidential election.
Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth — his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject — he cannot possibly be a "natural born citizen," one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.
Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.
At least one other appeal over Obama's citizenship remains at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and Hawaii officials have confirmed.
Berg says Obama also may be a citizen of Indonesia, where he lived as a boy. Federal courts in Pennsylvania have dismissed Berg's lawsuit. Federal courts in Ohio and Washington state have rejected similar lawsuits.
Allegations raised on the Internet say the birth certificate, showing that Obama was born in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961, is a fake.
But Hawaii Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino and the state's registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, say they checked health department records and have determined there's no doubt Obama was born in Hawaii.
The nonpartisan Web site Factcheck.org examined the original document and said it does have a raised seal and the usual evidence of a genuine document.
In addition, Factcheck.org reproduced an announcement of Obama's birth, including his parents' address in Honolulu, that was published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Aug. 13, 1961.
(This version CORRECTS that Hawaii officials, not secretary of state, confirmed Obama birth certificate.)
Court: No review of Obama's eligibility to serve - Yahoo! News
"It'd be the best gig around, if it wasn't for the f#*king kids!"
-Bozo the Clown reflecting on his career
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Well, at least we can rest assured that Barry will probably be the last president to cheat his way into the White House with fake birth records. Anyone much younger than him would have some sort of medical data base, wouldn't they?
The greetings are over, eh? Good to see you regaining your idiotic observations, futz.
Firstly, the supreme court has ruled. Not good enough for you? Would you prefer God itself come down to examine the documents in question?
Secondly, why would a futuristic database, (any database) be impenetrable to any sort of tampering?
Putz's future:
![]()
"It'd be the best gig around, if it wasn't for the f#*king kids!"
-Bozo the Clown reflecting on his career
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Very true. The Obamie Whamie team did a great job of forging and tampering with the evidence this time around.
Oh, I see. The Supreme Court is good enough when it comes to dealing with Barry, but not good enough when it comes to W's first election? Interesting...
Last edited by nuckingfutz; 10th December 2008 at 18:34. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I said "good enough for YOU" twit.
This is the last desperate attempt of the blinded right.![]()
"It'd be the best gig around, if it wasn't for the f#*king kids!"
-Bozo the Clown reflecting on his career
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Yes I have, BUT you have also conveniently considered me to be an Obama = Jesus type whereas I simply am not. You probably STILL think I voted for him -which I did not, and you mistakingly have now ASSumed that I trust our supreme court in any way shape or form, which I don't. I have never questioned Obama's national identity from any start at all.
You on the other hand are contradicting yourself without even realizing it, in that you take the SC's word for GWBs election results, but not in this case.
And as I recall you railed the other way claiming that no law suits had ever been filed.
I then dutifully posted several (with links) and you became strangely silent. Funny that!
Last edited by jimbo; 10th December 2008 at 20:08. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
"It'd be the best gig around, if it wasn't for the f#*king kids!"
-Bozo the Clown reflecting on his career
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'm contradicting MYSELF? Good god, jim, I'm now positive you're delusional. YOU are the one that originally posted that....let's see, how did you put it? Oh yes, rather succinctly, which is odd for you. "Firstly, the supreme court has ruled." Now, jim, why would you even mention them if you didn't "trust" them? I don't assume anything and I've never said you voted for Barry, but you sure sound like a disciple.
Come on now, jim. Keep your eyes on the ball. We're not talking about dissatisfied voters or tampered voting machines, we're talking about the Supreme Court. Focus!
Good question.
What do the Clintons have on Obama?
Camille Paglia on Obama choosing Hillary as Secretary of State, and more | Salon
I will say again, slowly and clearly for you: I wrote: "Firstly, the supreme court has ruled. Not good enough for YOU?" <<this indicates YOUR belief in the supreme court,...NOT mineWith me?
Why would I ever mention them??...well, in response to your disbelief of Obama's nationality of course.
I really thought you'd be able to grasp this.
Here is a hint, when you read: "Firstly, the supreme court has ruled. Not good enough for YOU?"...you might try changing it into: "Not good enough for ME?"....or "Is the supreme court ruling not good enough for nuckingfutz?"
Do you want to know about me now? Do I trust our Supreme Court system? Of course not. I don't trust them anymore now then I did before, but then I have never distrusted Obama's nationality in the first place.
Why would I? He's never struck me as being an idiot, and only an idiot would take on the arduous task of a presidential election race with the very strong possibility of being disqualified in the end. I consider your clinging belief that this has been "fixed" as ridiculous as you probably consider my clinging belief that the gwb electionS were stolen.
You've assumed plenty with me in regards to the past election race. If I really gave a shit, I would dig for the threads and posts.
Try this very simple questionnaire:
1.) Do you believe in the US supreme court's decision making process?
yes or no?
2.) Did you accept the supreme courts decision regarding GWB's first election?
yes or no?
3.) Do you accept the supreme court's current decision regarding Obama's nationality?
yes or no?
hint: if you answered yes to the first two and no to the third, you are a hypocrite.
Now, ya see...on THIS thread, RIGHT HERE, I made a reference to ANOTHER thread where you and I were disputing whether ANY lawsuits had EVER been filed by ANYONE regarding the first election. I cited them, you vanished. mmmmkay? We all clear on that now? I hope you have never coached a team or plan to, because it's your focus that seems a bit off.
Actually based on your past idiocracy (verified and supported by 80% of the active posters here) I can't for the life of me understand why I am getting involved with any post you touch. Perhaps it reminds me of why I have always done a decent job in adult classrooms, but was never very good at teaching the kiddies.
Face it, you are the latest ajarn post whipping boy, and I'm sure you know it.....but I'm most sure that you REALLY enjoy it.![]()
Whatever,...enjoy man....stroke it till it's blue
More regarding our little squabble,...frankly speaking I have heard stronger contentions from a misanthropic queef!
After you go out and learn some argumentation/debate skills.....gimme a shout![]()
Last edited by jimbo; 11th December 2008 at 06:48. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
"It'd be the best gig around, if it wasn't for the f#*king kids!"
-Bozo the Clown reflecting on his career
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks