I agree it's ridiculous ... but sad to think only the right wing would be all over it if there was even a kernel of truth to it.
Good point. And that is exactly what sickens me about American politics. One side smells blood in the water and they're all over it. Do whatever it takes to discredit the opposition. This latest story with the Governor of Illinois. The RNC is desperately trying to tie him to Obama.
Here's where you and I differ. I think the Republicans are much better at, and spend more time at, attacking and trying to discredit Democrats. How much time and money was spent throughout the '90s trying to bring down Clinton? For what? Cause he lied about having sex. Questions that should never have been asked in the first place. I remember reading a quote from a French newspaper during the Lewinsky crap that said, (I'm paraphrasing )"Why with all the problems in the world today, does America insist on looking through peepholes for their news?"
Let me see if I can respond to this without degenerating into name-calling like you. But I will use a play from your book of "debating technique":
1) I don't trust them, so no.
2). I never doubted W winning the election in the first place, so the SC decision is a non-issue to me.
3) No
There. Happy now? That's how you've responded and, hey, sounds look a good dodging of the questions to me.
So ya see, IF there were anything to these "lawsuits" that you so diligently dug up, then the left-wing media would be all over it like stink on a soi dog. I do remember amending my questioning to successful lawsuits, but you aren't much for nuance are you? jim, and trust me on this, I've got more athletic coaching experience in my little finger than you will ever have. You're just gonna have to accept that as fact...or not, I don't care.
Ah yes, what the fine intelligent posters here think of my idiocracy (sic) in the past makes me "unworthy" of you replying civilly? But only 80%? I would have thought it would be nearer to the full 100%. I'm disappointed. Somehow, I have a hard time picturing you in any classroom setting...but, hey, it takes all kinds.
I decided before I ever started posting here that a lot of the posters here don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. With some notable exceptions, I haven't been proven wrong.
Right. Can't keep up so you cut and run? Nice "technique" jim. Are you sure you're not a disciple of the American jesus?
Can't keep up with the latest whipping boy? Surely you jest.You just bore me...but then again I've got some time to burn, so I'll try and "keep up"
Don't follow that tripe. Whaaa????
Admittedly, you surprised me. I guess I had ASSumed you believed in the GREAT US Supreme Court. My bad.
Nooooooooooooooooo shit smirnoff. (don't believe in the US S.C. but DO believe in the Reps way...mooooooooooooooh-kay.
Ehm, not. I'm not much for checking and rechecking and back-paging something that has been posted and done already.nuances are fine by me, but can be a bit confusing when done online.
Ah! 1st stage of forum meltdown. Pretending to know a-n-y-t-h-i-n-g real about an internet "neme-sigh".....
Nope. Simply your past idiocracy (itself) prevents me....
touche' biatch. if you were teaching my kids, I'd sue the school
I've never followed this logic. You find an online 'confederacy of dunces' (by your own definition) and choose to hang online with them??
Last edited by jimbo; 11th December 2008 at 21:54. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
"It'd be the best gig around, if it wasn't for the f#*king kids!"
-Bozo the Clown reflecting on his career
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
As much as I loathe them, the Republicans are a much more effective party than the Democrats. The Democrats have no balls and cave on everything; the past eight years, during much of which the Dems have been in control of both houses of Congress, have seen Dems constantly falling over themselves to accomodate whatever Bush has asked for. They are a completely ineffective opposition party, and their ability to govern is also suspect.
Obama has already caved or rejected everything he campaigned for. The justification for his campaign was that he didn't support the war and was not Hillary, who he said, by virtue of her support of the war, lacked the judgment necessary to be president. But now she can be secretary of state, and Obama's cabinet looks to be rife with Clinton cronies.
The effort to bring down Clinton was not because he lied about sex; it was because he lied under oath, which is perjury, which is a felony, and may properly be seen as an impeachable offense. Perhaps the questions should never have been asked in the first place. Perhaps they should have been. That is of no consequence. One is not free to simply lie in response to questions asked under oath, regardless of whether they should or should not be asked. If they are legally improper, they can be objected to, and the judge can rule on the objection. The lawful choices one has when asked a question under oath is to 1) answer the question truthfully or 2) refuse to answer it on some legal grounds that can then be ruled upon. Lying is not a valid option.
I just wish the Dems would have been equally vigorous in going after Bush as the Republicans were in going after Clinton, as Bush was certainly the worse of these two abysmal presidents.
Last edited by David K; 11th December 2008 at 22:46. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Last edited by nuckingfutz; 11th December 2008 at 22:58. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
"It'd be the best gig around, if it wasn't for the f#*king kids!"
-Bozo the Clown reflecting on his career
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Effective at what? Lying? Deceitfulness? Smear campaigns? Attack ads? Waging war? Alienating and dividing the Nation? What the fuck are they better at?
Dave, you need to get your facts straight. Democrats have had control for 2 years.
I'll admit in the two years Democrats have been in control they've accomplished very little, but "falling all over themselves to accomodate Bush"?
He hasn't even been inaugurated yet and you've got him caving on everything he promised.
The justification for his campaign? So, that was Obama's sole reason for running, huh?![]()
Perhaps you'd like to choose another word.
Perhaps? Ya think?
Perhaps Mr. Starr shouldn't have been given 87 million dollars of taxpayer money to bring down the President.
Perhaps Clinton should never have been subpoenaed in the first place.
Under Clinton:
Economy: the Strongest Economy in a Generation
Longest Economic Expansion in U.S. History
Moving From Record Deficits to Record Surplus.
Paying Off the National Debt.
More Than 22 Million New Jobs.
Fastest and Longest Real Wage Growth in Over Three Decades
Household Income Breaks $40,000 for First Time in History
Unemployment is the Lowest in Over Three Decades.
Lowest Poverty Rate Since 1979
Increased the Minimum Wage
Enacted the Workforce Investment Act
Education: Largest Investment in Education in 30 Years
Expanding Work Study and Pell Grants
Crime and Drugs: Lowest Crime Rates in 25 Years
Largest Gun Enforcement Initiative in History
Developed Comprehensive Anti-Drug Strategy Including a $195 Million National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign
Lowest Percentage of Americans on Welfare in 35 Years
Yeah, those Clinton years were horrible weren't they?
Bullshit. You're a closet conservative.
I don't know what misquoting you are referring to, but feel free to SPECIFICALLY correct me. i'm not above admitting a mistake. But.....Oh yay!! Now we get to flame others for high post counts when WE are posters tooooooo!!! Yippeeeee!
(I don't keep much of an eye on my post count, or ever mention it, but thanks for the reminder and heads up.
And......Welcome to stage 3 of forum meltdown.
Just three more to go. Go putz, go!!
(made a small mistake above and said stage 1 <<that was your temporary ban actually.
So,....to recap.
Stage 1: temporarily banned
Stage 2: pretending to know truths about other posters you've never met.
Stage 3: Showing dismay and flaming other poster's counts.
(can you guess what comes next??)
----------------------------
--------------
------
Originally Posted by David K (Barak Obama)![]()
Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah, Blah, blah, blah, blah.....
Wonder where your new buddy got off to?![]()
Last edited by jimbo; 12th December 2008 at 15:11. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
"It'd be the best gig around, if it wasn't for the f#*king kids!"
-Bozo the Clown reflecting on his career
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
[SIGH] god, I hate working with little kids. OK, boy, here is what I said:
And here is what you said I said:Oh, I'd hardly call it hanging with them...more like loving to tweek them and be their whipping boy as they seek to put me in my place.![]()
You left parts out, and when you do that you should put the (...) ellipsis but you probably wouldn't know that being uneducated and all. Its called taking things out of context hence a deliberate misquote. I forgive you your ignorance jimbo. Did you make your way through school by plagiarizing jim? That's unethical too...but I'm sure all that's lost on you. There jim, you've been SPECIFICALLY corrected. Don't let it happen again. My patience has its limits.Oh, I'd hardly call it hanging with them...more like loving to be their whipping boy.
Far be it from me to flame your post count. I'm just wondering what kind of person it takes to get to 20,000 posts with nothing to say.
Sure you don't.
I don't claim to know much about other posters, but I'm virtually 100% sure on that one. Call it a meltdown if you want, but it's still a fact. Some things are so blatantly obvious that meeting you is certainly not required to make the observation.
Dismay? At what? It takes a lot more than the likes of you to "dismay" me. You just keep living in your fantasy world jim, leave real life for the rest of us.
He's probably been banned for telling the truth on this board. Seems to happen a lot around here, although I will say the kiddie sex stuff was way over the top.
"It'd be the best gig around, if it wasn't for the f#*king kids!"
-Bozo the Clown reflecting on his career
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Just let the right wingers wallow in their misery for the next eight years...or more. Losing hurts, don't it??![]()
If you're going through hell - keep going!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-Winston Churchill
"It'd be the best gig around, if it wasn't for the f#*king kids!"
-Bozo the Clown reflecting on his career
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks