Wikipedia, Ziopedia or Judeopedia? - Page 3 - Ajarn Forum

Boonmee · 6th April 2008, 06:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larkinny

If you still doubt the author, note the pro-Israel bias on their USS Liberty page:

Quote:

Others claim that the attack was premeditated and deliberate. They note that the Liberty was more than twice as large as the El Quseir, and was clearly designated with Latin rather than Arabic letters. Proponents include the surviving Liberty crewmen, [1] and some former U.S. government officials, including then-CIA director Richard Helms and then-Secretary of State Dean Rusk as well as Admiral Thomas Hinman Moorer, former Chief of Naval Operations and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

USS Liberty incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yeah, that's so one-sided and pro-Israeli!

...And that's from the very web page you provided as evidence of this Zionist-controlled world.

Larkinny · 10th April 2008, 21:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boonmee

USS Liberty incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yeah, that's so one-sided and pro-Israeli!

...And that's from the very web page you provided as evidence of this Zionist-controlled world.

This thread is about Zionist control of Wikipedia.

Boonmee · 10th April 2008, 22:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larkinny

This thread is about Zionist control of Wikipedia.

Are you stupid?

I was quoting Wikipedia, wasn't I?

keeshou · 10th April 2008, 22:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larkinny

This thread is about Zionist control of Wikipedia

So if someone posts something from Wikipedia, that doesn't prove that point, it's off limits?

Larkinny · 17th April 2008, 18:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boonmee

Are you stupid?

Unbelievable!

Quote:

I was quoting Wikipedia, wasn't I?

You said, "And that's from the very web page you provided as evidence of this Zionist-controlled world."

Where did I state that is evidence of a "Zionist-controlled world"?

robitusson · 17th April 2008, 18:34

I'm not sure if this is related to this thread but anyway.....
.................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .....
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/09/mo...0A&oref=slogin

Eyeing Pornography That Uses the Holocaust as Titillation
By LAURA KERN
Published: April 9, 2008

In early-1960s Israel pornographic, possibly anti-Semitic novels that detailed sensational tales of the torture and rape of male concentration camp prisoners by curvaceous female Nazi guards rapidly rose from marginal pulp reading to mass-market popularity.

Heymann Brothers Films
The cover of a stalag, an Israeli pornographic paperback.

Ari Libsker’s documentary “Stalags” is named for these pocket-size books, which were written under American pseudonyms in a style that suggested translation. (They were in fact done in Hebrew by Israeli writers, some of whom appear on screen.) The film examines the rise and fall of this short-lived craze and the doors it opened for discussing the Holocaust, a previously hush-hush subject in Israel.
The film also considers possible inspirations for the Stalags, from the 1961 trial of the high-ranking Nazi Adolf Eichmann, which exposed sexual abuse within concentration camps, to the works of K. Tzetnik, a Holocaust historian or fabricator, depending on whom you ask. (His books recounted similar atrocities.)
Preceding “Stalags” is Roee Rosen’s “Two Women and a Man,” an intriguing 16 minutes of trickery that offer a seemingly biographical portrait of a female artist and writer, and is a warm-up exercise in how society perceives indecency. “Stalags” carries this line of inquiry forward, cramming an overwhelming amount of information and ideas into its 63 minutes — not nearly enough time to explore satisfactorily all that it raises.

esoteric1 · 17th April 2008, 20:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by robitusson

I'm not sure if this is related to this thread but anyway.....

same here...but what the hell.

Once we've all received a Lubavitcher education, I'm sure we'll see things in a different light.

For the 30th year in a row US President proclaims Education and Sharing day 2008:

Quote:

Education and Sharing Day pays tribute to the unique efforts of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe. The Rebbe helped create numerous education and outreach centers, which continue to provide social service programs and humanitarian aid at home and around the globe.

from: Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A., 2008 - Stories - Chabad-Lubavitch News

"in honor of the Rebbe:"

Quote:

The Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, known simply and lovingly as "the Rebbe," has cast the warm glow of his sanctified existence, his Solomonic wisdom, his vision for a world perfected, and his sensitivity and love for humanity( ), over the lives of millions, to the farthest reaches of the world.

Through his inspired vision, the Rebbe endowed us with a passion for the good and the G-dly, and the means to understand that the good and the G-dly are inherent in our world and within each of us and in our everyday lives. It is a vision that will inspire the world for generations to come.

from: Chasidism

and Chabad-Lubavitch.

(nice how such a small radical(and racist) sect of Judaism has such easy access to power, isn't it?)

Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A., 2008 - Stories - Chabad-Lubavitch News

a "pleasant and peaceful way" will be used to ensure that we non Jews see the light.

Quote:

Aren't we busy enough working with Jews? Can we really afford to divert time and money to the campaign to transform the gentiles?

[T]he Rambam uses the expression, "lakuf ("to forcefully influence") all inhabitants of the world to accept the Noachide commands." Although obviously one must do this in a pleasant, gentle, and peaceful way, it still must be done with persistence. If you have already tried several times, try again nevertheless. We frequently see that although people are sometimes spoken to five times, they do not change until they hear it a sixth time!

--Purim, 5747, Sichos in English, vol. 35, p. 4.

Sorry to say, it appears necessary to protest against those who have the attitude and are voicing the opinion that they simply could not be bothered and that they have no time for [convincing the citizens of the world to observe the Seven Noachide Laws]. Remember, the Rambam rules that this was commanded by G-d through Moshe--can anyone gainsay (contradict) this command?!

--Shabbos Parshas Tsav, 5747, Sichos in English, vol.35, p.76.

Quote:

Praying in front of non-Jews:

[T]he Jews have been given a special mission to teach the gentiles the Seven Noachide Laws which are intended to spread peace and equilibrium throughout the world. Furthermore, a Jew is always conscious of the existence of G-d, Who controls every aspect of the world and watches each deed performed by a Jewish person. Therefore, before he does anything to benefit from the world, he recites a blessing that can be heard by all those around him, even gentiles. When a gentile hears a Jew make a blessing this makes an impression on him as well; for example, it will prevent him from stealing for he will always remember that there is a G-d watching every aspect of his behavior. In this manner, our acts can add to the proliferation of peace and justice in the world.

--"Address to N'shei Ubnos Chabad," 26th day of Elul, 5746, Sichos in English, vol. 32, p. 205.

from: The Rebbe on the Hasidic Gentile Campaign

I know you all can't wait to be "pleasantly and peacefully" forced to comply with the 7 Noachide Laws.

This btw is not just a 'campaign' in the US.

Whitehouse link:

Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A., 2008

Boonmee · 18th April 2008, 03:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larkinny

Unbelievable!

You said, "And that's from the very web page you provided as evidence of this Zionist-controlled world."

Where did I state that is evidence of a "Zionist-controlled world"?

Some people's stupidity astounds me!

Let me take this slowly for you: you provided a piece of "evidence" to support your claim that Wikipedia is governed by Zionists. The very same piece of "evidence" which you provided, informs the reader of a very different side to the story.

You now realise that this contradicts the point you were trying to make, and you're trying desperately to squirm out of it, by changing the point under discussion. It ain't gonna work. You provided a text on the basis that it backed-up your argument. It doesn't . What's your next move?

Cream · 18th April 2008, 04:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boonmee

What's your next move?

Blame the Jews!!

Boonmee · 18th April 2008, 04:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cream

Blame the Jews!!

When in doubt...

robitusson · 18th April 2008, 09:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cream

Jew

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cream

Jews

Larkinny · 18th April 2008, 18:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boonmee

Some people's stupidity astounds me!

Quote:

Let me take this slowly for you: you provided a piece of "evidence" to support your claim that Wikipedia is governed by Zionists. The very same piece of "evidence" which you provided, informs the reader of a very different side to the story.

And in the OP I pointed out very clearly, which anyone with an ounce of intelligence could see, that:

Quote:

Investigations of the attack

Several official US and Israeli investigations maintained the initially published conclusion that the event was a tragic mistake through misidentification.

Complete and utter bullshit. There have not been several official investigations. There has only been one, the Navy Court of Inquiry, and that found the attack was deliberate, but reported falsely that it was not because they were directed by President Johnson and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara to report falsely.

But try to edit that Wikipedia page to reflect the truth and see what happens.

Got it now?

That passage, and earlier, where it says, "Both the Israeli and American governments conducted multiple inquiries into the incident, and issued reports concluding that the attack was a tragic mistake, caused by confusion about the identity of the USS Liberty", are blatant lies.

But try to edit that Wikipedia page to reflect the truth and see what happens!

How difficult can it be to understand this?

keeshou · 18th April 2008, 21:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boonmee

You now realise that this contradicts the point you were trying to make, and you're trying desperately to squirm out of it, by changing the point under discussion. It ain't gonna work. You provided a text on the basis that it backed-up your argument. It doesn't . What's your next m