Wikipedia, Ziopedia or Judeopedia? - Ajarn Forum

Larkinny · 22nd March 2008, 03:01

Quote:

Updated February 7, 2008

(M)y induction into the Wikipedia cult was doomed from the start. The fatal blow? I branched out from editing non-controversial stuff and one day I decided to edit some articles dealing, peripherally, in one way or another, with Jews. You know, like Jews, Israel, Palestine, the enemies of the Jews (the designated "anti-Semites"), stuff like that.

Why? Cuz those are some of the most outrageously sucky articles in the whole suckathon called Wikipedia, that's why. I lasted about two days, carefully making only the most minor, cautious and reasonable edits.

Then, disgusted and enraged, I penned this gorgeous spitwad of a F-you missive, like a rock through a window, and left it up on my homepage to see how long it would take before the Wikipedia Cops showed up to haul me off.

Took about 12 hours ...

I would like to point out that Wikipedia is an illusion and probably does not exist. There is, however, a bizarre entity known as ZIOpedia, which masquerades as Wikipedia. Ziopedia means that Wikipedia has been taken over by Zionists, Jewish ethnocentrists and their Gentile supporters.

Most articles having anything to do with Jews or Israel exhibit Jewish or Zionist bias, despite noble efforts by many Ziopedians to promote the Wiki farces of Neutral Point of View and other types of scientific and scholarly discipline.

Most of these people are militant Jews, but some are liberal and Leftist Judeophilic Gentiles. This has wrecked much of the quality of many of such pieces. Make the tiniest edits to any of these pieces and the militant Judeophilic gatekeepers immediately spring into action to "protect the tribe", and all of your edits will be reverted within hours with no discussion given.

Try to discuss and you will be met with silence or the usual dissembling, sophism, lawyerese, nonsense, BS, diversion, nitpicking, ad hominem, red herrings, false comparisons, and trivialism, along with and every logical fallacy known to mankind.

Not only that, but you will be put on Ziopedia's very own Neo-Nazi watch list"! LOL! Can you believe it? Object to Ziopedia's control freaks, and you're automatically a Nazi - even Commies like me.

The founder of Ziopedia is a sleazy porn merchant named Jimbo Wales. Jimbo has deep links with powerful US militant Jewish interests. He is also a passionate Zionist. The vast majority of Wiki admins, arbitrators and top staff are also Zionists and Judeophilic. A vastly disproportionate number of them are also Jewish.

Jimbo Wales runs this fraudulent website with an iron fist, along with his Wiki-fascist PC brigades. Go against Dear Leader Zio-Jimbo and watch yourself get slowly banned from the Ziopedia Travesty ...

The huge over-representation of militant Jews on Wikipedia is one of those aspects of Wikipedia that is not immediately obvious, but kind of creeps on you after a while. With time, you start to realize what it is and it knocks you out of your chair when you do.

For what you see in this aspect of Wikipedia is a full-blown Jewish Media Control Conspiracy, operating right in front of your very eyes, in full view to anyone willing to look.

Read more...

If you still doubt the author, note the pro-Israel bias on their USS Liberty page:

Quote:

Investigations of the attack

Several official US and Israeli investigations maintained the initially published conclusion that the event was a tragic mistake through misidentification.

Complete and utter bullshit. There have not been several official investigations. There has only been one, the Navy Court of Inquiry, and that found the attack was deliberate, but reported falsely that it was not because they were directed by President Johnson and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara to report falsely.

But try to edit that Wikipedia page to reflect the truth and see what happens.

guttersnipe · 22nd March 2008, 03:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larkinny

If you still doubt the author

Yup, still - does he have any convincing evidence, articles, quotes to back up his ranting?

keeshou · 22nd March 2008, 14:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larkinny

Wikipedia, Ziopedia or Judeopedia?

Jew too?

Benedict XVI · 22nd March 2008, 15:03

Many references to Jews, Judaism, and Israel are consistently edited and deleted, even when nuetral.

I think there are Jews and Zionists and Israel supporters that monitor Wikipedia by the hour.

Many odd deletions and edits.

Larkinny · 22nd March 2008, 19:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by guttersnipe

Yup, still - does he have any convincing evidence, articles, quotes to back up his ranting?

Other editors feel the same way. See here:

Quote:

Jimbo Wales has stated ... what his political views are many times, and has personally harassed and chased off left-leaning people, even admins like Secretlondon. Then there are his appointees to ArbCom like the conservative Fred Bauder, the Zionist POV pusher Jayjg who was appointed over people with more votes than him and so forth. - Olivier Besancenot

It's interesting how the propaganda that everyone is equal in Wikipedia succeeds so well too - so many sites wrongly claim that Wikipedia is democratic, when anyone who's edited there knows it's no such thing - a group of 700 or so administrators hold power over the "lower class", and up above the administrators you have ArbCom, then the Wikimedia Foundation, then Jimbo - who can quite literally get away with ANYTHING he wants to, with one of his favourite quotes being a very fascist-sounding one that "voting [democracy] is evil" - Selina

-----

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benedict XVI

Many references to Jews, Judaism, and Israel are consistently edited and deleted, even when nuetral.

I think there are Jews and Zionists and Israel supporters that monitor Wikipedia by the hour.

Many odd deletions and edits.

Indeed.

Wikipedia's claim: ~ 'We are an internet encyclopedia with a neutral stance' ~ is absurd.

Benedict XVI · 23rd March 2008, 01:27

The Jews rule the roost when it comes to information.

We must be aware and conscious of it, and talk about it.

If we discuss it, we can make people aware.

I am goyim.

Piece Train · 23rd March 2008, 01:57

I prefer Conservapedia:

Main Page - Conservapedia

How can you go wrong with articles like this??

"Not only is the news media hostile toward religion, particularly Christianity, but the media may be spreading a "Gospel of Godlessness" on the American public." [9]
Apostles of Atheism [10]

wangsuda · 23rd March 2008, 09:01

I still find it amazing how less than 0.22% of the world's population can control everything. Must be great for the Christians - to have two whipping boys: after all, if you cannot nuke the muzzies, blame it on the Jews. This crap gets boring.

tomcat · 23rd March 2008, 10:21

I remember when the Cabal was happy with just the banks....

robitusson · 23rd March 2008, 10:42

Jews

Larkinny · 24th March 2008, 22:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by wangsuda

I still find it amazing how less than 0.22% of the world's population

I understand the world Jewish population is around 13 to 14 million, but I can't be arsed to do the sums to see if your figure is correct.

Quote:

can control everything

Out of that 13 million or so there would only be a few thousand or so that would have considerable influence - Jewish billionaires, they're called by some.

Quote:

This crap gets boring

If you don't think there's a factual basis to the claim, consider this: control the banking system (the U.S. Federal Reserve is a private body predominately made up of Jewish bankers or their agents) and control the flow of information (the media) and you effectively control the world.

On that last point, see here:

Quote:

This extraordinarily high-ranking commission (in 2003) was reporting on the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty. Many analysts believe that the Liberty attack could be Israel's undoing --at least as far as US support is concerned --if Americans knew the facts about it.

But they don't. Here's why:

A search of hundreds of the largest news media in this country indexed by Lexis-Nexis does not turn up a single US newspaper that mentioned this commission, a single US television station, a single US radio station, a single US magazine.

robitusson · 26th March 2008, 12:05

Larkinny · 27th March 2008, 18:45

Robitusson, while you posted that in jest, it's not that far off the mark: the Jewish mission is to Juda-ize other cultures and to eliminate all other religions, and ultimately, to destroy all non-Jews (save for a remnant to be used as slaves). If you don't believe it just pick up a Jewish Bible and do a little reading.

Topper · 27th March 2008, 18:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larkinny

If you don't believe it just pick up a Jewish Bible and do a little reading.

Its called a Torah as I recall. But as an expert on Jews, I'm sure you're aware of this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larkinny

Robitusson, while you posted that in jest, it's not that far off the mark: the McDonalds's mission is to de-KFC other cultures and to eliminate all other forms of food, and ultimately, to destroy all non-McDonalds lovers(save for a remnant to be used as slaves