Obambi Exposed - Page 9 - Ajarn Forum

robitusson · 3rd August 2008, 20:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xtrafresh

I remember saying that if we followed your suggestions / recommendations than Israel will cease to exist...which of course is my opinion.

What suggestions are these? You're lying again. I have never suggested Israel do anything here. You're a liar.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xtrafresh

I never said the destruction of Israel was your personal opinion. Please learn to differentiate the two.

You certainly implied it. Once again when reality didn't suit your stance you made shit up. You're looking for enemies and anti-semites where there are none. Dickhead.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xtrafresh

I thrive in atmospheres in which I am going against the flow.

The only flow you're going against is the flow of people being truthful, broad-minded and reasonable.

You really think that you represent some kind of opposition to everybody else here. All the diversity of opinion here and then you.

You live in your own little dreamland. Nothing wrong with that per se but unfortunately it involves those who choose to live in reality to make you feel special and different.

Farangrakthai · 3rd August 2008, 20:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xtrafresh

If i recall correctly you said something to the effect that I must know more than all the other experts when it came to article 80 of the UN charter. Is that what you are referring to?

we had debates over hundreds of posts about Israel and neo-con ideology (neo-colonization, shaping the world as you put it = liberal) and up till the last ones, it was a pretty civil discussion but then you started shouting about how you were beating me like it's a high school football game, that Israel has the right to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians out of the west bank and the U.N. doesn't understand international law otherwise it wouldn't pass any resolutions against Israeli occupation of Palestinian land.

as I mentioned this if off topic from the thread, so it's better for you "neo-con viewpoints" thread, IMO.

and b.t.w. I'm not a Liberal (which shouldn't be a bad word anyway). I'm a Libertarian, like Ron Paul without the social conservative views.

anyway red is the color of Republicans right?

Xtrafresh · 3rd August 2008, 21:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Farangrakthai

we had debates over hundreds of posts about Israel and neo-con ideology (neo-colonization, shaping the world as you put it = liberal) and up till the last ones, it was a pretty civil discussion but then you started shouting about how you were beating me like it's a high school football game and that Israel has the right to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians out of the west bank.

as I mentioned this if off topic from the thread, so it's better for you "neo-con viewpoints" thread, IMO.

and b.t.w. I'm not a Liberal (which shouldn't be a bad word anyway). I'm a Libertarian, like Ron Paul without the social conservative views.

anyway red is the color of Republicans right?

Yep red is the colour of the republican party. Fits me quite nicely if you ask me

I agree with everything but one small point. I did not go around shouting that I beat you until you accused me of academic dishonesty. Tit for tat. As the Brits would say: cheers m8.

edit: btw you totally ignored article 80 of the un article in which it pertains to the 1922 league of nations mandate.

wanghunghigh · 3rd August 2008, 21:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xtrafresh

Both of which I will defend with my dying breath if need be.

Don't let us stop you, then. If you're prepared to lay down your life for your beliefs, why don't you join Bush & Co's crusades through the Arab world by joining the Army?

Your dying breath... if only. I'd wager that a few people here would be willing to pay a fair few bucks to witness that joyous occasion.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xtrafresh

I love pissing liberals off.

How do you know for sure that everyone here is a liberal? Have you met them all? Or is it a case of “if you’re not with me, you’re against me”? When did 'liberal' become a dirty word?

Here are a few definitions of 'liberal':
- showing or characterized by broad-mindedness
- having political or social views favoring reform and progress
- tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition
- a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties

What definitions would you choose to use? Nah, forget it… I think we can already guess.

You, sir, are a narrow-minded, backward thinking, intolerant, authoritarian fascist.

Your retarded, deluded, posts would be incredibly funny but for the fact that sad little people like you actually hold and abuse the power derived from their positions in political office. Sadly, we let these demons run amok.

BTW, I’m an anarchist (in the purest sense of the word).

Nick · 3rd August 2008, 21:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by wanghunghigh

Don't let us stop you, then. If you're prepared to lay down your life for your beliefs, why don't you join Bush & Co's crusades through the Arab world by joining the Army?

Your dying breath... if only. I'd wager that a few people here would be willing to pay a fair few bucks to witness that joyous occasion.

How do you know for sure that everyone here is a liberal? Have you met them all? Or is it a case of “if you’re not with me, you’re against me”? When did 'liberal' become a dirty word?

Here are a few definitions of 'liberal':
- showing or characterized by broad-mindedness
- having political or social views favoring reform and progress
- tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition
- a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties

What definitions would you choose to use? Nah, forget it… I think we can already guess.

You, sir, are a narrow-minded, backward thinking, intolerant, authoritarian fascist.

Your retarded, deluded, posts would be incredibly funny but for the fact that sad little people like you actually hold and abuse the power derived from their positions in political office. Sadly, we let these demons run amok.

BTW, I’m an anarchist (in the purest sense of the word).

green

jimbo · 3rd August 2008, 21:19

Xtrafresh:

Do me a small favor, would ya?

STAY OUT OF MY PM BOX.

Thanks ever so much.

But to answer your PM'd question: "Both"

Uncle Harry · 3rd August 2008, 21:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick

Quote:
Originally Posted by wanghunghigh View Post
Don't let us stop you, then. If you're prepared to lay down your life for your beliefs, why don't you join Bush & Co's crusades through the Arab world by joining the Army?

Your dying breath... if only. I'd wager that a few people here would be willing to pay a fair few bucks to witness that joyous occasion.

How do you know for sure that everyone here is a liberal? Have you met them all? Or is it a case of “if you’re not with me, you’re against me”? When did 'liberal' become a dirty word?

Here are a few definitions of 'liberal':
- showing or characterized by broad-mindedness
- having political or social views favoring reform and progress
- tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition
- a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties

What definitions would you choose to use? Nah, forget it… I think we can already guess.

You, sir, are a narrow-minded, backward thinking, intolerant, authoritarian fascist.

Your retarded, deluded, posts would be incredibly funny but for the fact that sad little people like you actually hold and abuse the power derived from their positions in political office. Sadly, we let these demons run amok.

BTW, I’m an anarchist (in the purest sense of the word).
green

ditto

Xtrafresh · 3rd August 2008, 21:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbo

Xtrafresh:

Do me a small favor, would ya?

STAY OUT OF MY PM BOX.

Thanks ever so much.

But to answer your PM'd question: "Both"

I do not give out reds or greens to other poster but I do read the ones that people give me Jimbo gave me this red:

Obama train a' comin! 3rd August 2008 19:55 jimbo focus on NOT starting wars

I asked him if he meant the potential Iran war or the forum war in a private message. Have i fairly described everything so far Jimbo?

Well I will not answer both charges:

1: Negotiations should be in order with Iran. For the past 4 years they have stalled. Now they are about to go beyond the point of no return. If they do not stop than I will strongly advocate for such an attack.

2: In regards to forum wars....it takes two people to fight. We can respectfully agree to disagree but once you start insulting me then it becomes personal. I will always stand up for what I believe in and I will always hold my ground. If that makes me the bogeyman then so be it. I much rather be hated for who I am than loved for who I am not.

Since you asked me to stay out of your pm box then I will jimbo. Just stay out of my rep box in return.

Xtra

aging one · 3rd August 2008, 21:55

X how do you figure Iran is gonna attack us? Its that simple, give me the attack scenario.

jimbo · 3rd August 2008, 21:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xtrafresh

Since you asked me to stay out of your pm box then I will jimbo. Just stay out of my rep box in return.

No. They are different entities entirely. If you PM me again, I'll just put you on ignore, no biggie. But I will continue to dish out reds and greens to whomever I feel deserve it.

PS: I doubt you could red or green anyone right now, even if you wanted to.

Xtrafresh · 3rd August 2008, 22:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbo

No. They are different entities entirely. If you PM me again, I'll just put you on ignore, no biggie. But I will continue to dish out reds and greens to whomever I feel deserve it.

PS: I doubt you could red or green anyone right now, even if you wanted to.

I like the colour red for some reason. Makes me feel like a bad ass. Oh I will continue calling you m8.

Cheers m8

Intrepid · 3rd August 2008, 22:26

Iran has every right in the world to develop nuclear weapons.

If USrael attacks, Iran will just develop nuclear weapons at a faster pace. Or Pakistan will supply the technology and the materials.

panhunger · 3rd August 2008, 22:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Intrepid

Iran has every right in the world to develop nuclear weapons.

Rights got nothing to do with it. If leaders of Iran call for the destruction of Israel, it's only makes sense for Israel and its allies to defend themselves against that...

wanghunghigh · 3rd August 2008, 22:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Intrepid

Iran has every right in the world to develop nuclear weapons.

And they will have them soon... Insha'Allah