How come a movie with all around horrid reviews and 21% on Tomatometer has one of the biggest openings in movie history which took over 200 million in just 5 days??????
WTF is wrong with people? Does Michael Jackson make a cameo?
How come a movie with all around horrid reviews and 21% on Tomatometer has one of the biggest openings in movie history which took over 200 million in just 5 days??????
WTF is wrong with people? Does Michael Jackson make a cameo?
It must be that sexy beast Shea Labeuf (or whatever the fuck his name is)
I took my 6 year old son to see it as he loved the first movie.
I still don't know what the plot was about.![]()
It was all so fast paced except for the saccharine love love scenes which were really corny. The fight scenes were so quick and done in close ups on 30m high robots that I couldn't figure out who was hitting who.
A right confusing mess of a movie with only one redeeming feature.
![]()
We must not confuse statistical probability with some transcendental and utterly compelling force.
movie reviewers want some sort of clever story, this is a movie based on a cartoon, bad robots wants to take over the world, good robots fight the bad ones and win.
cool shiny robots that kick arse, and loads of special effects, just pure simple entertainment.
see above
Sometimes my mind wanders, sometimes it leaves completely
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I ALWAYS GIVE A 100% AT WORK:
12% Monday
23% Tuesday
40% Wednesday
20% Thursday
5% Friday
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
That's the premise, not the narrative.![]()
We must not confuse statistical probability with some transcendental and utterly compelling force.
...unfortunately, there's no razzie for longest period of uninterrupted noise...
...nor for least annoying character in an ensemble performance...a category for which this waste of digitized space produced no contenders at all...
Movie reviewers want movies, not just robots hitting each other for two and half hours. The Dark Knight, Old Boy, and the first two Spiderman movies were all highly rated by critics and all based on comic books. The difference is they all had a narrative structure, cinematic style and were well acted. Transformers 2 is just a lot of noise and zero substance.
I agree, it was just noise and flashing lights for 2 hours, the action scenes didn't have any build up either, meaning that by the last act I was just not blown away by the special effects anymore, just wanted to go home for a kip. it included almost every cliche in the book and the demise of 'The Fallen' a thousand years ago or what ever it was was a carbon copy of the death of the bad guy at the beginning of LOTR. crap.
'After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box'
I didn't really rate the first one, so I doubt I will bother to see it. Its a bit hard to care when robot fights robot. Fairly impossible for me to suspend my disbelief too![]()
...a dress on a man can say that this person works in the cabaret or a cross-dressing or both
Boom
agree Pantzy, I felt the same about King Kong fighting a dinosaur, was just like watching a computer game.
'After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box'
...a dress on a man can say that this person works in the cabaret or a cross-dressing or both
Boom
75% of the US is culturally inept so trannies 2s success doesnt surprise.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks