LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksDoesn't the Earth's core have enough energy?
simple gas line straight down, problem solved.
next!
Doesn't the Earth's core have enough energy?
simple gas line straight down, problem solved.
next!
Miles and miles to go before I sleep...
With current technology they could be using a system of lage solar arrays in orbit and beaming the energy down to ground collection stations by microwave laser. But no world power wants the other to have such a potential weapon in space.
We must not confuse statistical probability with some transcendental and utterly compelling force.
In the Koran it says " Split the atom and within it ye shall find a sun"
Me thinking a lot more energy can be taken from atoms.....and when we have evolved enough this technology with give us warp capacity and mater transformaton..Imagine no traffic just swipe a bar code on your forehead in a little cubicle in your house and materialize at work ....on another planet.
This shit is just around the corner...we have to learn not to drop coke cans throughout the universe or try and colonises everybody else out there
Slip of the tongue.Originally Posted by re_fuse
We must not confuse statistical probability with some transcendental and utterly compelling force.
Does dark matter exist?
RimmerSlip of the tongue.
-----
It is not chocolate
Last edited by re_fuse; 22nd August 2007 at 08:42. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
invisible collisions speak to that possibility. Maybe one should query Darkman, he of all people should know. If not he shoud be stripped of his moniker.
Scientists have detected the gravitational effect of matter in the movement of astral bodies but not the matter itself. Hence the name Dark Matter. It may in fact turn out to be not matter at all but a flaw in the theories of gravitation or Einstiens Relativity theory. Along with Dark Energy (the unseen force that is causing the universe to expand at an ever increasing rate) it is one of the big questions of atronomical science in recent years.
We must not confuse statistical probability with some transcendental and utterly compelling force.
If those are flawed, what else is? How about the theories on the make-up of comets(ball of ice)?
THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF COMETS AND THE EVOLUTION OF CELESTIAL BODIES (Introduction)
http://www.the7thfire.com/education/...comets_I-a.htm
all theories are just ideas...hypotheses put forward...
tautologies 'proved' by their own terms.
"so please show no pity as we come up from the ground, and please remember as you kill us and cut us down that time will not wash clean the bloody face of history, and someone will breathe here again and they will hate you for what you leave." m.g.
In other words we humans really don't know squat, eh?
that's the one...
we like to pretend we do...and it keeps a lot of people in jobs but...
"so please show no pity as we come up from the ground, and please remember as you kill us and cut us down that time will not wash clean the bloody face of history, and someone will breathe here again and they will hate you for what you leave." m.g.
the main reason agnosticism is best.
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." --The Dude.
Some feilds of science are theory based because you cannot empirically test the universe by creating a universe in controlled conditions and observing it. Meterology and Plate Tectonics along with Astrophysics are good examples. Determining the creation by Evolution theory is another.
Other feilds are provable such as Mechanics or Thermodynamics or Organic Chemistry because we can reproduce those effects and measure them in a controlled environment.
The other side has a good thread running on this at the moment as well.
We must not confuse statistical probability with some transcendental and utterly compelling force.
The Dark Side?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks